KNAV - Case Study: Debt Capacity

What is debt capacity?

Theresa Zeidler, Valuations Practice Director, and Krisha Shah, Valuations Manager, at KNAV explain how the firm conducted a debt capacity analysis for a client to determine the Company's ability to assume additional debt.

Our dynamic, collaborative and deeply personal approach is what truly sets Praxity apart. Bringing together 85,000 dedicated professionals from across the globe is no small feat. Collaborative, communicative, and client-centric, our Alliance is founded on shared values that bind us together. That’s why we’re proud to introduce the Praxity Charter, a first-of-its-kind symbol of our commitment to agility, transparency and excellence.

Across the world, our values unite us. Praxity Alliance members are handpicked through a rigorous selection and application process, ensuring that every single Member Firm represents the industry’s highest standards. Together, members collaborate and combine expertise to solve complex challenges with a competitive edge, meeting international needs through a shared vision of success. Unwaveringly, we believe that we go further together.

The Charter itself signifies the culmination of extensive research, conducted by our external partner agency. The process began with a consultation with the Board, swiftly followed by a selection of in-depth telephone interviews; next, we ensured that every single Member had their voice heard at our Global Conference.

Our takeaway was clear; the Alliance provides critical global connections, with Member Firms forming strong relationships between one another, throughout the world. The personal nature of these relationships builds trust, enabling members to refer work with deep-seated confidence. Client satisfaction comes first, and the true strength of the Alliance is the ability to put the needs of the clients above the usual dividing lines of geography, discipline, and firm.

Quickly, it became evident to us that Member Firms treat each other’s clients as if they were their own, providing responsive and effective solutions to unlock new value on an international scale. The practice of open and proactive collaboration was initially adopted intuitively, with Member Firms naturally pooling expertise without needing a prompt. This is something we remain deeply proud of and, in celebration of this, we chose to commemorate this unique form of collaboration through a one-of-a-kind codified document: The Praxity Charter.

The final charter was officially unveiled at the Global Leadership Conference in Rome, where it was signed by each of our Alliance Member Firms. At its core, the Charter speaks to the values that define Praxity: client delivery excellence, unparalleled communication, and international collaboration.

Each of these three values are unpacked in more detail throughout the Charter.

Triggers for debt capacity

Loan approvals:  

Banks conduct debt capacity analysis to assess a business's creditworthiness and ability to repay before approving a loan.

Fairness opinions: 

A fairness opinion may be sought when a company is considering taking on new debt, refinancing existing debt, or engaging in other significant debt-related transactions. The opinion typically evaluates whether the terms and conditions of the proposed debt are fair from a financial perspective, evaluating factors such as interest rates, fees, covenants, and other terms of the debt agreement.

Transfer pricing: 

While making their Corporate tax Self Assessment (CTSA) returns each year, a company is obliged to make its return in accordance with the arm’s length principle, which means making the return as if it was borrowing on a stand-alone basis from a third-party lender, disregarding group guarantees.

Regulatory tax requirements: 

To curtail inflated finance cost claims, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”) requires a debt capacity analysis as part of CTSA returns, ensuring that finance costs align with the arm's length principle and reflect genuine borrowing capacity. 

TheresaZeidler

Practice Director, Valuations at KNAV

Krisha Shah

Manager, Valuations at KNAV

Assessing debt capacity metrics

The balance sheet and cash flow statements are two key financial statement measures to assess a company’s debt capacity. A few key metrics used to assess a company's debt capacity are outlined below:

No.Debt Capacity Analysis MetricsFormulaAnalysis
1Total debt/EBITDA(Total debt (Short term debt + Long term debt)) / EBITDAThe higher the EBITDA level, the higher the debt capacity of a company.
2Debt/Equity(Short term debt + Long term debt + Other fixed payments) / Shareholder’s equityA higher debt-equity ratio indicates that a company is highly leveraged and may have borrowed more money than it can easily pay back.
3Cash flow-based metricFree Cashflows (FCF) = EBITDA - Interest - Taxes +/- working capital requirements +/- other operational liabilities - capital expenditure.The higher the free cash flows, the higher the company’s ability to meet its interest obligations.
4Interest coverage ratioEBIT / Interest expenseThe higher the ratio, the higher the ability of a company to meet interest expenses and other finance costs.

Case study:

The following case study illustrates how we conducted a debt capacity analysis for a client in the context of the HMRC requirements.

Daxin COO Yue Hong Meets with Daxin Saudi Chairman Abdullah Fahad Al sahli. Credit: Daxin Global 

Background: ABC Ltd is based in Nottingham, United Kingdom. It currently holds external debt financing through bank loan facilities and loan notes totalling £1,250,000. The Company intends to secure additional debt finance by issuing 10% loan and Payment in Kind ("PIK") notes amounting to £750,000 to the investors. The total capital employed by the company is £1,975,000.

Challenge: The Company already has existing debt and plans to obtain additional debt financing. It wants to determine whether any disallowance would arise in claiming borrowing costs for debt exceeding the appropriate debt level ("debt capacity") due to the UK’s thin capitalisation rules.

Solution: We conducted a debt capacity analysis to determine the Company's ability to assume additional debt.

The following methods were used to ascertain debt capacity of ABC Ltd:

Method 1: Comparative industry ratio analysis

Comparative industry ratio analysis uses ratios developed from comparable companies as a benchmark in assessing the relative performance of a company for their conformity with the specific industry norms. The comparable companies are selected based on the credit rating of the subject company, computed using Prof. Edward Altman’s Z-score model.

(All amounts in £)


DescriptionAmount
Median debt to capital ratio of comparable companies with similar credit ratings (A)60.00%
Total capital of the subject company as of December 31, 2024 (B)1,975,000
Estimated debt capacity (A*B)1,185,000

Method 2: Capitalised discretionary cash flow method

This approach is generally more appropriate for non-investment grade companies with a strong tangible asset base. Standard advance rates (e.g., 60% for net current assets and 40% for fixed assets excluding goodwill) against balance of assets, as of the valuation date, can be used to determine the debt capacity of a company.

The debt capacity of ABC Ltd. using the asset based lending method is as follows:

DescriptionAmount
EBITDA for the year ended FY 2024£500,000
Depreciation for the year£20,000
Marginal corporate tax rate applicable19.00%
Projected sustainable capital expenditure provided by the company£21,000
Working capital requirements provided by the company£20,000
Long term sustainable growth rate2.00%
Discount rate6.00%

Using the capitalised discretionary cashflow method, the company’s debt capacity can be assessed as exhibited –

(All amounts in £)


DescriptionAmount
EBITDA - 2024500,000
Minus: Depreciation and amortization(20,000)
EBIT480,000
Minus: Tax @ 19.00%(91,200)
EBIT (net of tax)388,800
Plus: Depreciation and amortization20,000
Minus: Capital expenditure(21,000)
Plus/Minus: Release/ (Investment) in working capital(20,000)
Free cashflow to the firm (FCFF) (F0)367,800
FCFF (F1)375,156
End of year discount factors are based on the discount rate (R)6.00%
Long term growth rate (G)2.00%
Capitalisation rate (R-G)4.00%
Enterprise value - Capitalised value (A)9,378,900
Industry debt to capital ratio - Market value basis (B)30.00%
Estimated debt capacity (A)*(B)2,813,670


Method 3: Debt capacity based on covenants

This approach considers various debt covenants computed based on the analysis of a company’s operating cash flows to arrive at the desired level of debt capacity.

The inputs used are –

DescriptionAmount
Interest rate (% of total debt)10.00%
Current cash£600,000
EBITDA£500,000
EBIT£480,000

Appropriate benchmarking ratios are based on ratios of comparable companies. The cost of debt has been based on the median cost of debt of comparable companies.

(All amounts in £)

CovenantsBenchmark ratiosWeightsDebt capacity
Total Debt/EBITDA4.3x0.33716,667
Net Debt/EBITDA4.0x0.33866,667
Interest Coverage (EBIT / Interest) - Note A1.9x0.33842,105
MinMinMin
Estimated debt capacity2,425,439

Note A: Interest Coverage

Description

DescriptionAmount
Normalized EBIT (A)480,000
Interest Coverage ratio - Industry (B)1.9x
Interest allowed on loan (C = A/B)252,632
Estimated debt capacity (C/10.00%)2,526,316

Method 4: Asset based lending

This approach is generally more appropriate for non-investment grade companies with a strong tangible asset base. Standard advance rates (e.g., 60% for net current assets and 40% for fixed assets excluding goodwill) against balance of assets, as of the valuation date can be used to determine the debt capacity of a company.

Debt capacity of ABC Ltd. using asset based lending method is as follows:

The inputs used are –

DescriptionAmount
Cash£600,000
Net current assets excluding cash£875,000
Fixed assets excluding goodwill£75,000

The weightage given to the inputs used depend on the valuer’s judgement, based on the facts and circumstances of the business.

(All amounts in £)

DescriptionWeightsAmountsDebt capacity
Cash1.00600,000600,000
Net current assets excluding cash0.60875,000525,000
Fixed assets0.40500,000200,000
Estimated debt capacity

1,325,000

The weightage given to the inputs used depend on the valuer’s judgement, based on the facts and circumstances of the business.

Results

The debt capacity ascertained from each of the above methods is assigned appropriate weights based on the industry in which ABC Ltd operates.

(All amounts in £)

DescriptionDebt capacityWeightsWeighted debt capacity
Method 1: Comparative industry ratio analysis1,185,0000.25296,250
Method 2: Capitalised discretionary cashflow2,813,6700.25703,418
Method 3: Debt capacity based on covenants2,425,4390.25606,360
Method 4: Asset based lending1,325,0000.25331,250
Weighted debt capacity

1,937,278

Conclusion

The total debt (existing plus proposed) compared with the computed debt capacity, helped ABC Ltd to gain clarity on the amount of borrowing costs eligible for deduction under thin capitalisation rules. Our analysis also helped ABC Ltd to consider optimising its debt structure or exploring alternative financing options that align with regulatory requirements.