GlobalData ESG Sentiment Polls

Sound accounting can counter growing skepticism on corporate ESG

Aoife McGurk, associate analyst at Thematic Intelligence, summarises the results of GlobalData’s latest ESG sentiment polls report, highlighting their importance to the accounting profession and cross-sector businesses stakeholders.

E​​​​​​​nvironmental, social and governance (ESG) issues are increasingly influencing how business is conducted globally. According to GlobalData's ESG framework, environmental concerns include climate change, pollution, biodiversity, and natural resources. Social factors range from human rights and diversity to community impact, health, and safety, while corporate governance involves corporate structure, risk management, corruption and bribery, and ethics. These ESG themes are increasingly influencing business conduct in all sectors. 

The last two years have been a stark reminder of why ESG needs to be taken seriously. Numerous CEOs and boardrooms have come under financial, legal, and public pressure for failing to address key ESG issues properly. This trend will continue as stakeholders – including investors, regulators, suppliers, customers, and clients – demand greater transparency and action on a full spectrum of ESG issues.  

Matt Rodgers

Managing Director EMEA, OneStream

Charles Story

Director, Operations for Corporate Investigative Services, Rehmann

Skepticism towards corporate ESG initiatives

Every quarter GlobalData Strategic Intelligence conducts ESG sentiment polls across GlobalData's network of 28 B2B websites, which attracted 10 million unique visitors in Q2 2024. This latest sentiment analysis showed heightened skepticism towards corporate ESG initiatives, with many participants viewing them as superficial greenwashing attempts. The majority of respondents - 53% - agreed with the statement “For most companies, ESG is just a marketing exercise.” This proportion has increased significantly since Q1 2021.

Best in Class – 100 Best Accounting Firms in Italy Awards

This perception has likely been worsened by several high-profile greenwashing scandals. For example, European consumer group the BEUC criticized tech giant Apple for branding its smartwatch as carbon neutral at its 2023 launch. The criticism stemmed from Apple's use of unreliable carbon offsets, which have sparked numerous scandals in recent years. Carbon offsets help companies cancel out residual emissions. However, these offsets are often not fully measurable and contribute to greenwashing allegations. Accurate reporting and auditing of sustainability data will be vital to combat this.  

Another revelation from the report was that respondents believed improving financial performance was the primary driver of corporate ESG action. One-third of participants believed this was the main reason why companies should adopt an ESG performance plan.  

The second most common response was government pressure and legislation, likely driven by the rapid influx of ESG-related regulations worldwide. These include the expansion of the EU's emissions trading system (ETS), the US's implementation of its Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting frameworks. These developments are transforming the ESG landscape from a voluntary, consumer-led regime to a mandatory one. 

Best in Class – 100 Best Accounting Firms in Italy Awards

GlobalData refers to the shift in what is driving ESG as ESG 2.0. This second phase of ESG emphasises the environmental aspect, with governments and strict regulation forcing companies to reduce their impact on the climate.

The new wave of sustainability reporting standards

With the influx of mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, accountants will have to get to grips with an array of ESG-related terminology and concepts. Sustainability reporting is becoming integrated into financial reporting, so accountants must ensure that sustainability data is as robust as its financial equivalent and that proper paper trails are maintained. Sustainability reporting was often conducted by marketing departments. It is now being taken over by finance departments that must ensure reporting stands up to auditor scrutiny.  

Reporting standards can be a major challenge due to the number of ESG-related standards and legislation. To illustrate how overly complicated this alphabet soup has now become, it now includes the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, the standards of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), ISSB S1 and S2, the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the EU’s Green Taxonomy, the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFRD), the UK’s Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting policy (SECR), the CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project), the Science-based Targets Initiative (SBTi), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Boards (SASB), and many others.  

Accountants must become familiar with these standards and rules and know to which companies and jurisdictions they apply. Some will become as familiar to accountants as UK GAAP or IFRS. Finance departments, more broadly, need to take over and keep tight control of sustainability reporting. Misleading reporting can lead to accusations of greenwashing, leading to fines. 

The largest challenge within sustainability reporting will be accurate Scope 3 emissions reporting. Scope 3 refers to emissions released by a company's entire value chain. The largest components of this for most companies are usually emissions from purchased goods and services, which are emissions suppliers generate, and from the use of sold products, which are emissions customers generate when they use a product or service. Many sustainability reporting regimes now require companies to disclose these Scope 3 emissions. Currently, most companies rely on standardised estimates but, over time, companies will seek more precise information from their suppliers and clients. This is so that they can track whether emissions are going up or down over time from individual suppliers, which is impossible when using standardised estimates. Accountants will be tasked with assembling and scrutinising this data and will likely need more advanced tools and technologies to allow data sharing over supply chains.  

Accountants need to be ready, if they are not already, for a new era of ESG where finance departments play a central role in corporate sustainability strategies. 

Aoife McGurk is an associate analyst at GlobalData Thematic focusing on sustainability and the impact of emerging technologies on agribusiness.